Detección del ciclo económico en Ecuador con
técnicas de series temporales: un enfoque univariado y multivariado con
evidencia empírica aplicando el Filtro de Hodrick-Prescott.
Galo
Fernando Moya-Castillo*
Francisco
Xavier Viera-Vaca*
ABSTRACT
The
purpose of this study is to identify and analyze economic cycles in Ecuador
through the application of time series techniques, using both univariate and
multivariate approaches. Official macroeconomic data such as Gross Domestic
Product (GDP), deposits, unemployment, and other relevant variables are used to
detect cyclical patterns that characterize the country's economic behavior in
recent years. A rigorous empirical analysis is conducted using the
Hodrick-Prescott Filter to identify the expansion and contraction phases of the
Ecuadorian economy. This research aims to contribute to a better understanding
of national economic dynamics by providing valuable insights for the design and
implementation of more timely and effective public policies. Additionally, the
study incorporates theoretical elements from classical and Keynesian schools of
thought to contextualize the results within a solid conceptual framework. The
findings will serve as a basis for future research on the country's
macroeconomic stability and its vulnerability to external shocks.Principio del formulario
Final
del formulario
Keywords:
Economic cycle, Time series, Hodrick-Prescott Filter, Univariate approach,
Multivariate approach
RESUMEN
El propósito de este estudio
tiene como objetivo identificar y analizar los ciclos económicos en Ecuador
mediante la aplicación de técnicas de series temporales, utilizando enfoques
univariado y multivariado. Se emplean datos macroeconómicos oficiales, tales
como el Producto Interno Bruto (PIB), los depósitos, el desempleo y otras
variables relevantes, con el fin de detectar patrones cíclicos que caractericen
el comportamiento económico del país durante los últimos años. A través del
filtro de Hodrick-Prescott, se realiza un análisis empírico riguroso que
permite identificar las fases de expansión y contracción de la economía
ecuatoriana. La investigación busca contribuir a una mejor comprensión de la
dinámica económica nacional, ofreciendo insumos útiles para el diseño e
implementación de políticas públicas más oportunas y efectivas. Asimismo, el
estudio incorpora elementos teóricos de las escuelas clásicas y keynesianas,
con el fin de contextualizar los resultados obtenidos dentro de un marco
conceptual sólido. Los hallazgos permitirán establecer una base para futuras
investigaciones sobre la estabilidad macroeconómica del país y su
vulnerabilidad frente a choques externos
Palabras clave: Ciclo económico, Series
temporales, Hodrick-Prescott, Enfoque univariado, Enfoque multivariado
INTRODUCTION
Identifying the
economic cycle is an essential tool for macroeconomic analysis, as it allows us
to recognize the phases of expansion and contraction of economic activity, thus
facilitating the formulation of public policies, given that, as El camino al crecimiento (The Road
to Growth) rightly points out, the road to growth is not a steady one; on the
contrary, it suffers from cyclical fluctuations, with periods of boom and
recession, which occur in most economies. In emerging economies such as
Ecuador's, characterized by high vulnerability to external shocks and fiscal
constraints, knowing the current position of the economic cycle is particularly
relevant to avoid pro-cyclical policies that could aggravate fluctuations
. The analysis of
economic cycles has been the subject of study in macroeconomic literature from
different schools of thought. Cycles represent recurring fluctuations in
aggregate economic activity, reflected in variables such as gross domestic
product (GDP), employment, investment, and prices. Various quantitative
methodologies have been developed to detect them, among which time series
decomposition approaches stand out, such as the Hodrick-Prescott filter and the
Baxter-King filter.
These tools make it
possible to separate the cyclical component from macroeconomic series,
facilitating the identification of expansion and recession phases.
On the other hand,
some technical reports and institutional documents from the Central Bank of
Ecuador have addressed cycles in a descriptive manner, without applying robust
econometric methodologies.
This review
highlights a gap in academic research regarding the use of multivariate models
and more comprehensive empirical analyses for the study of economic cycles in
the country. In this regard, the present study seeks to contribute to the
literature through the combined application of univariate and multivariate
approaches, using time series techniques on official macroeconomic data, which
will allow for a more complete understanding of the cyclical dynamics of the
Ecuadorian economy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research will be
conducted using a quantitative approach, applying econometric time series
techniques to detect the Ecuadorian economic cycle through a combined
univariate and multivariate analysis.
In the univariate
approach, the Hodrick-Prescott (HP) filter will be used to decompose the
macroeconomic series Gross Domestic Product (GDP), deposits, and unemployment
into their trend and cycle components. The smoothing parameter will be set at λ = 1600, which is appropriate for
quarterly data, and unit root tests (ADF and KPSS) will be applied to confirm
stationarity. This step will allow the expansion and contraction phases of each
variable to be identified individually.
In the multivariate
approach, a VAR (Vector Autoregressive) model will be constructed with the
series in their stationary forms. The selection of the optimal number of lags
will be made using information criteria (AIC, BIC). Once the model has been
estimated, the Principal Components (PCA) of the series generated by the VAR
will be obtained, with the aim of synthesizing the multivariate information
into a single indicator representative of the economic cycle. The first
principal component, which concentrates the greatest common variance, will be
interpreted as the aggregate economic cycle.
This multivariate
cycle will be analyzed in conjunction with the results of the univariate
approach to verify consistency in the phases detected. Finally, the estimated
VAR will be used to project the principal component, allowing us to anticipate
the possible evolution of the economic cycle in the short term.
The data series will
be obtained from the Central Bank of Ecuador and the National Institute of
Statistics and Census (INEC), ensuring their official status and consistency.
The study period will include all available quarters up to the most recent one.
This integrated
methodological design combines the descriptive clarity of the univariate
approach with the synthetic and predictive capacity of the multivariate
approach, generating a robust and anticipatory view of the national economic
dynamics.
RESULTS
Figure 1 shows the evolution of seasonally
adjusted GDP in Ecuador, represented by the LOGPIB_SA series between 2000Q1 and
2025Q1, showing an upward trajectory with slight fluctuations, suggesting
sustained economic growth with moderate cycles. The use of logarithms allows
changes to be interpreted as growth rates, facilitating the identification of
proportional variations in the level of economic activity. Seasonality has been
corrected, eliminating periodic distortions and allowing for a clearer view of
underlying cyclical movements. Visually, phases of deceleration can be seen,
especially around 2009 and 2020, coinciding with the global financial crisis
and the pandemic, respectively. These temporary declines interrupt the general
trend, justifying the use of a VAR model to capture the interdependencies
between GDP and other macroeconomic variables. This approach will allow us to
estimate the economic cycle and evaluate the response of GDP to structural
shocks.
Figure 1 Evolution of Ecuador's real GDP, 2000-2025
Source: Test results
Prepared by: Galo Moya
As shown in Table 1, the ADF unit root
test applied to the LOGPIB_SA series indicates that seasonally adjusted GDP is
stationary in levels. The t-statistic (-5.354) is significantly lower than the
critical values at 1%, 5%, and 10%, and the p-value (0.0000) allows us to
reject the null hypothesis of the presence of a unit root. This validates the
use of LOGPIB_SA at levels within the VAR model, without the need for
differentiation, which facilitates the analysis of dynamic relationships
between macroeconomic variables.
Table 1. Unit Root Test at LOGPIB SA Levels
|
Null
Hypothesis: LOGPIB_SA has a unit root |
||||
|
Exogenous: Constant |
|
|
||
|
Lag Length: 0
(Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=12) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t-Statistic |
Prob.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augmented
Dickey-Fuller test statistic |
-5.354099 |
0.0000 |
||
|
Test critical values: |
1% level |
|
-3.497029 |
|
|
|
5% level |
|
-2.890623 |
|
|
|
10% level |
|
-2.582353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*MacKinnon
(1996) one-sided p-values. |
||||
Meanwhile, Figure 2 shows the seasonally
adjusted LOGDEPOSITO series, which reflects the evolution of financial deposits
in Ecuador between 2000 and 2025, eliminating periodic fluctuations to
highlight structural trends. The graph shows a sharp decline around 2008,
coinciding with the global financial crisis, followed by a sustained recovery
and stabilization in subsequent years. This behavior suggests the banking
system's sensitivity to external shocks, as well as its ability to adapt in the
medium term. The use of logarithms allows changes to be interpreted as growth
rates, facilitating proportional comparisons between quarters. The seasonal
adjustment applied improves the accuracy of the cyclical analysis by isolating
transitory effects. This variable will be incorporated into the VAR model
alongside GDP and unemployment, allowing for the evaluation of dynamic
interactions between the financial system and economic activity. Its inclusion
is key to identifying economic cycle transmission mechanisms and macroeconomic
policy effects.
Figure 2 Evolution of Deposits, 2000-2025
Fuente:
Resultados del Test
Elaborado
por: Galo Moya
En
la tabla 2 el test ADF aplicado a LOGDEPOSITO_SA en niveles no permite rechazar
la hipótesis nula de raíz unitaria (t = -1.317, p = 0.6191), indicando que la
serie no es estacionaria. Los valores críticos superan el estadístico
observado. Por tanto, se requiere diferenciar la serie para su uso en modelos
VAR, asegurando propiedades estadísticas adecuadas.
Table
2.
Test Raíz Unitaria en Nivel LOGDEPOSITO_SA
|
Null Hypothesis: LOGDEPOSITO_SA has a unit root |
||||
|
Exogenous: Constant |
|
|
||
|
Lag Length: 1 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=12) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t-Statistic |
Prob.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic |
-1.317424 |
0.6191 |
||
|
Test critical values: |
1% level |
|
-3.497727 |
|
|
|
5% level |
|
-2.890926 |
|
|
|
10% level |
|
-2.582514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. |
||||
In Table 3, the ADF test applied to the first
difference of LOGDEPOSITO_SA confirms the stationarity of the series. The
t-statistic (-7.774) is significantly lower than the critical values at all
levels, and the p-value (0.0000) allows us to reject the null hypothesis of a
unit root. This validates the use of the differentiated series in VAR models,
ensuring statistical consistency and avoiding spurious regression problems in
the dynamic analysis.
Table 3. Unit Root Test in D(LOGDEPOSITO_SA)
|
Null
Hypothesis: D(LOGDEPOSITO_SA) has a unit root |
||||
|
Exogenous: Constant |
|
|
||
|
Lag Length: 0
(Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=12) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t-Statistic |
Prob.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augmented
Dickey-Fuller test statistic |
-7.774890 |
0.0000 |
||
|
Test critical values: |
1% level |
|
-3.497727 |
|
|
|
5% level |
|
-2.890926 |
|
|
|
10% level |
|
-2.582514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*MacKinnon
(1996) one-sided p-values. |
||||
Source: Test results
Prepared by: Galo Moya
In Figure 3, the unemployment variable
represents the proportion of the economically active population that is
unsuccessfully seeking work, which is a key indicator of labor performance in
Ecuador. Its evolution reflects structural and cyclical impacts, such as the
2008 financial crisis and the 2020 pandemic, which significantly increased the
unemployment rate. In the period analyzed, the series shows moderate
fluctuations, with values between 8% and 9.8%, suggesting some persistence in
structural unemployment. This variable will be incorporated into the VAR model
along with GDP and deposits, allowing for analysis of its dynamic interaction
with the economic cycle. Its inclusion is essential for assessing the effects
of macroeconomic shocks on the labor market and designing public policies aimed
at employment recovery.
Figure 3 Unemployment Trends 2000-2025
Source: Test results
Prepared by: Galo Moya
In Table 4, the ADF unit root test applied
to the unemployment variable indicates that the series is stationary at levels.
The t-statistic (-9.442) is considerably lower than the critical values at 1%,
5%, and 10%, and the p-value (0.0000) allows us to reject the null hypothesis
of the presence of a unit root with high confidence. This validates the use of
the unemployment variable in its original form within the VAR model, without
the need for differentiation. Its stationarity guarantees adequate statistical
properties for the dynamic analysis of macroeconomic relationships.
Table 4. Unit Root Test at Unemployment Level
|
Null Hypothesis:
DESEMPLEO has a unit root |
||||
|
Exogenous: Constant |
|
|
||
|
Lag Length: 0 (Automatic
- based on SIC, maxlag=12) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t-Statistic |
Prob.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augmented Dickey-Fuller
test statistic |
-9.442310 |
0.0000 |
||
|
Test critical values: |
1% level |
|
-3.497029 |
|
|
|
5% level |
|
-2.890623 |
|
|
|
10% level |
|
-2.582353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*MacKinnon (1996)
one-sided p-values. |
||||
Ecuador Economic Cycle (GDP) Univariate.
In Figure 4, Ecuador's economic cycle was
estimated using the Hodrick-Prescott filter, a methodology developed by Robert
J. Hodrick and Edward C. Prescott in 1980 to analyze GDP fluctuations. A
smoothing parameter of λ = 1600 was used, as
recommended for quarterly series, which allows the long-term trend to be
separated from the cyclical component. In the graph, the cyclical component
shows deviations from potential GDP, represented by the trend line. The black
line at zero indicates the equilibrium point: positive values reflect economic
expansion, while negative values indicate contraction.
Since dollarization in 2000, the
Ecuadorian economy has faced several shocks: the global financial crisis in
2007–2008, the earthquake in 2016, and the pandemic in 2020, all reflected as
significant declines in the cycle. In the recent period (2023–2025), the cycle
remains close to zero, indicating an economy with no clear momentum for
expansion. The fall in oil prices limits fiscal growth and reduces the scope
for countercyclical policies. This analysis makes it possible to identify
output gaps and guide economic policy decisions based on the country's cyclical
position.
Ecuador Economic Cycle (GDP) Multivariate.
The decision not to perform the
cointegration test is justified by the nature of the variables included in the
model. In this case, LOGPIB_SA and DESEMPLEO are stationary at levels (I(0)), while LOGDEPOSITO_SA is stationary in first
difference (I(1)). Given that Johansen's cointegration
test requires all series to be integrated of the same order, typically I(1), its application would not be methodologically valid.
Furthermore, the objective of the study is to analyze the short-term dynamic
relationships between the variables, for which a VAR model with stationary
series is sufficient and appropriate. Including variables with different
integration orders in a cointegration test could generate inconsistent or
uninterpretable results. Therefore, a mixed VAR approach is chosen, which
guarantees statistical robustness without compromising the validity of the
econometric analysis.
After running the VAR model, the model
residuals are created and then, using principal component analysis, the
multivariate economic cycle is calculated. Table 5 of the PCA is provided
below.
Table 5 Principal component analysis (PCA)
|
Principal Components Analysis |
|
|
|||
|
Date: 09/15/25 Time: 23:43 |
|
|
|||
|
Sample (adjusted): 2000Q3 2025Q1 |
|
|
|||
|
Included observations: 99 after adjustments |
|
||||
|
Balanced sample (listwise
missing value deletion) |
|||||
|
Computed using: Ordinary correlations |
|
||||
|
Extracting 3 of 3 possible components |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eigenvalues: (Sum = 3, Average = 1) |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
Cumulative |
|
Number |
Value |
Difference |
Proportion |
Value |
Proportion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1.157134 |
0.153263 |
0.3857 |
1.157134 |
0.3857 |
|
2 |
1.003871 |
0.164876 |
0.3346 |
2.161005 |
0.7203 |
|
3 |
0.838995 |
--- |
0.2797 |
3.000000 |
1.0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eigenvectors (loadings): |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable |
PC
1 |
PC
2 |
PC
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESID01 |
0.711371 |
-0.008229 |
0.702768 |
|
|
|
RESID02 |
0.574429 |
0.582946 |
-0.574635 |
|
|
|
RESID03 |
-0.404947 |
0.812469 |
0.419418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary correlations: |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESID01 |
RESID02 |
RESID03 |
|
|
|
RESID01 |
1.000000 |
|
|
|
|
|
RESID02 |
0.129211 |
1.000000 |
|
|
|
|
RESID03 |
-0.092748 |
0.004086 |
1.000000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 4 of the Multivariate Economic
Cycle shows the joint evolution of GDP, demand deposits, and unemployment in
Ecuador, broken down into their trend, cycle, and multivariate cycle
components. This representation allows for the clear identification of phases
of economic expansion and contraction, isolating temporary fluctuations from
structural movements. The multivariate cycle synthesizes the interaction
between real and financial variables, offering a more robust reading of the
macroeconomic environment. The methodology applied in EViews is based on the
estimation of a VAR model that incorporates GDP, demand deposits, and
unemployment variables. From this model, residuals are obtained, which capture
innovations not explained by the joint dynamics of the system. Subsequently,
through a principal component analysis of these residuals, the multivariate
economic cycle is extracted, allowing the identification of common patterns of
fluctuation between variables. This technique offers a more accurate and dynamic
view of economic behavior, revealing phases of slowdown or recovery that would
not be evident with univariate approaches.
Figure 4 Multivariate Economic Cycle
Source: Test results
Prepared by: Galo Moya
At this stage, the univariate economic
cycle will be projected using the exponential smoothing technique, applied
directly to the cyclical component extracted from a single representative
variable, such as GDP. This procedure allows for the generation of a smoothed
trajectory that facilitates the identification of recent trends and possible
turning points in economic activity. Once the projection has been obtained, the
economic cycle will be extracted again using a univariate approach in order to
observe how the cyclical component behaves under projected conditions.
As shown in Figure 5, the univariate
economic cycle projection was made using the Hodrick-Prescott filter on the
logarithmic series of Ecuador's quarterly GDP, with a lambda parameter of 1600.
This technique made it possible to separate the long-term trend from the
cyclical component, revealing fluctuations around potential growth. The cycle
projected through the fourth quarter of 2025 shows values close to zero,
suggesting a phase of economic stabilization. However, this reading must be
contextualized with recent events. As of September 2025, the Central Bank has
not yet published updated data, which limits the empirical validation of the
projection. In addition, the government has eliminated the diesel subsidy,
raising its price from $1.80 to $2.80 per gallon. This decision, although aimed
at reducing the fiscal deficit, could generate inflationary pressures and
negatively affect consumption and production, especially in sensitive sectors
such as transportation and agriculture. These factors could alter the projected
trajectory of the cycle, introducing risks of a slowdown that are not yet
reflected in the model. Therefore, it is recommended to complement the analysis
with indicators of prices, employment, and domestic demand to anticipate
possible deviations and adjust economic policy recommendations.
Figure 5 Projected Multivariate Economic Cycle
CONCLUSIONS
This research allowed for a comparison of
three approaches to analyzing the economic cycle in Ecuador: the univariate
cycle, the multivariate cycle, and the projection of the cycle using
exponential smoothing. The univariate cycle, extracted from seasonally adjusted
GDP using the Hodrick-Prescott filter, revealed clear patterns of expansion and
contraction. For its part, the multivariate cycle, estimated using a VAR model
and principal component analysis on the residuals of the GDP, deposits, and
unemployment variables, offered a more integrated view of economic behavior.
Both cycles showed a high similarity in their fluctuations, which validates the
use of the univariate approach as a methodological alternative in contexts with
data limitations.
The projection of the univariate cycle
using exponential smoothing allowed us to anticipate a phase of economic
stabilization towards the end of 2025. However, this reading should be
interpreted with caution, as in September 2025 the Central Bank has not yet
published updated data and the recent withdrawal of the diesel subsidy could
generate inflationary pressures and affect productive activity. These factors
could alter the projected trajectory and modify the behavior of the cycle in
the short term.
Overall, the results obtained offer useful
tools for monitoring the economic situation and designing more timely and
targeted countercyclical policies.
REFERENCES
Agénor, P. R., & Montiel, P. (2015).
Development Macroeconomics. Princeton University Press.
Baxter, M. &.
(1999). Measuring business cycles: Approximate band-pass filters for
economic time series. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 575–593.
Hodrick, R. J. (1997).
Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money,
Credit and Banking, 1–16.
Sala-i-Martin, X.
(2000). Apuntes de crecimiento económico. Barcelona: Antoni Bosch Editor.
* Econ. Msc. Universidad
Agraria del Ecuador
gmoya@uagraria.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3962-5230
* Econ Msc. Universidad
Agraria del Ecuador
fviera@uagraria.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9336-0213